We also see John talking about believers overcoming the devil, overcoming The Enemy because of the Word of God dwelling in them in 1 John 2. We should not stop asking questions about or digging for answers to this, the most important question in Christianity. 1 Jacob Arminius' position was very similar to that of John Wesley and was less extreme than the Arminians that followed him. Man is totally depraved. So, in Anselms case, it would have been feudal society, and in the case of the early church fathers, you had ransom theory, Christus Victor being well acquainted with the model of conquering kings. It might not be the one and done theory. This is different from pluralistic salvation where the cross is not needed since the particular Christian universalist sees in the cross the universal reconciliation of everything and everyone in creation. In a large way, Auln reinterpreted our first theory of atonement, the ransom theory. I also believe that Amy Gannett has a video on atonement theories saved on her IGTV if youre interested in following her. This view that Hugh Grotius saw, he said, that wrong, thats heretical. Johnson, Adam J (ed.). The next theory is government theory. It almost cant even be called an atonement theory, because it actually doesnt really like the idea of atonement at all. A Wesleyan view of immigration - The Wesleyan Church Its sifting through their writings and coming away with the themes and the ideas that theyre presenting were able to say, Okay. He held to total depravity and the need for grace. https://www.theopedia.com/satisfaction-theory-of-the-atonement, https://www.britannica.com/biography/Saint-Anselm-of-Canterbury/The-satisfaction-theory-of-redemption, https://www.theopedia.com/governmental-theory-of-atonement, https://wesleyanarminian.wordpress.com/2009/04/10/atonement-series-governmental-view/, https://digitalcommons.denison.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1064&context=religion, https://reknew.org/2017/05/christus-victor-atonement-girards-scapegoat-theory/. He says, The word of God, powerful in all things and not defective with regards to his own justice, did righteously turn against apostasy and redeem from it his own property, not by violent means, as the apostasy had obtained dominion over us at the beginning when its insatiably snatched away what was not its own, but by means of persuasion, as it became a God of counsel, who does not use violent means obtain what he desires, so that neither should justice be infringed upon, or the ancient handiwork of God go to destruction., What hes saying here is that humanity was snatched away from God, and had an evil Dominion placed over us, and it was snatched away by persuasion, by deceit. You could argue that with every single one of these theories though. Because that justice was done corporately and on a cosmic scale, then individuals could have access to God through Jesus. Satan didnt want to give up the children of God. This is according to the gospel coalition. This, he submits, makes better sense of the pattern of Scripture and the universal scope of salvation. He is a robber, a rebel, a tyrant, a usurper, unjustly laying hands on that which does not belong to Him. The Multi-Faceted View of Atonement - LOVE | ACCEPT - FORGIVE As I reflect on all the possible theories of atonement (and I again admit there are more not covered here), I am in awe of the power of the cross and the atoning work of Christ. (In the Wesleyan view, God's sustaining of the human race after Adam's sin was the first act of prevenient grace.)

Is Bob Bondurant Related To Bondurant Brothers, Are There Wild Hedgehogs In Missouri, Swap Meets In Kansas City Area, Articles W